you act like a loving+sane person, and that's good, bb. i'm not criticizing other's pov's on it, in fact, while i have to be critical about it for several reasons (including some guilt about watching it in the first place) i often borrow other's squee to coast through the rough patches. i might wail and rant, but then i go read missyjack's squeeful posts about how SPN is the most perfectest perfection ever to be perfected and i smile at her proud-mamaness and keep on keeping on.
yeah, well. i was describing your writing to someone and i was like, her writing is water after a hot day, you don't want to dip your toes in, you want to just let it envelop you completely and stay there, and float-- sometimes with people who have a signature way of writing (whose writing is more stylized than workmanlike) it's a bit of an effort to read. like, you have to be in the mood or something, because there's the real world and then there's that author's world and these two different worlds need some traversing. but, in your case, it's kind of effortless. i don't have to work up myself up for it, or be in a certain headspace like i do with other idiosyncratic authors which i --admittedly-- also enjoy. so yeah.
no subject
yeah, well. i was describing your writing to someone and i was like, her writing is water after a hot day, you don't want to dip your toes in, you want to just let it envelop you completely and stay there, and float-- sometimes with people who have a signature way of writing (whose writing is more stylized than workmanlike) it's a bit of an effort to read. like, you have to be in the mood or something, because there's the real world and then there's that author's world and these two different worlds need some traversing. but, in your case, it's kind of effortless. i don't have to work up myself up for it, or be in a certain headspace like i do with other idiosyncratic authors which i --admittedly-- also enjoy. so yeah.